Similar Products
No related products were found for this product. -
Camcorder Review: Canon Vixia HF100 vs Sony HandyCam HDR-CX12
25 Commentsat: www.geardig.com Hi-Def Flash based AVCHD camcorder comparison. The Canon Vixia HF100 and Sony HDR-CX12 (HDR-CX11e in Europe) are both in a league of thier own vs the competition but which is better? The HF100 is cousin to the HF10 and HF11. The CX12 is cousin to the HDR-SR11 and HDR-SR12. Includes color testing and motion testing. Taken in San Francisco. See it in hi-def at www.vimeo.com … gadget electronics HF100 HF10 HF11 CX12 SR11 Canon Sony camcorder comparison hd battle avchd beach …
Related posts:
- Review and Comparison of the Canon Vixia HV40 Camcorder The Canon HV40 is a MiniDV-based camcorder that belongs to...
- Canon VIXIA HF100 Flash Memory High Definition Camcorder with 12x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom ...
- Canon HG10 Camcorder Review The Canon HG10 camcorder is designed to be compatible with...
- Canon VIXIA HF200 Review: Packed With Features Founded in August 1937 in Tokyo, Canon is a leading...
- Sony LCS-CSH Camcorder/Digital Camera Case + Tripod + Accessory Kit for HandyCam HDR-CX12, CX100, SR12, SR11, SR10, SR220D, SR220, SR87, SR67, SR47, UX20, UX10, DCR-DVD910, DVD850, DVD710, DVD650, HDR-HC9, HDR-HC7, DCR-HC65, DCR-HC85 and Sony Cyber-shot D ...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
25 Responses to “Camcorder Review: Canon Vixia HF100 vs Sony HandyCam HDR-CX12”
-
dboyd1089 said on November 12th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
I think the picture looks better to Sony. . . It seems clearer and more daring. . . the gun seems a bit 'faded. . . gun bot seems to be hit? This is close. . .
-
iLLipino04 said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:16 pm
Sony does not have a guard of wind?
-
otterboxiphone said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
The United States is full of obese people.
-
IpodAppsEverywhere said on November 12th, 2009 at 9:30 pm
CANON ROCKS!
-
ElPandaDeLaAccion said on November 12th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
Canon FTW!
-
newandimproved100 said on November 12th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
Sony cancels Canon
-
xXMercifulFallXx said on November 12th, 2009 at 10:41 pm
Quality Vixia quality, in my opinion, is better video and audio.
-
equiz said on November 12th, 2009 at 11:31 pm
Sony Sucks A LOT, just have the brand. I have a Sony SR62 and it sucks a lot, even my videos made by a Canon A620 digital camera is better!
-
VC79JN89 said on November 12th, 2009 at 11:56 pm
I like the Canon better just because the colors appear more natural than the Sony.
-
DirectThis1 said on November 13th, 2009 at 12:26 am
and what accessories you have on them, if anyone?
-
DirectThis1 said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:13 am
This parameter is the camera?
-
namrur2 said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:50 am
Well, I liked the movement of color Canon is also much quieter. I have not. Just checking.
-
rakaryan06 said on November 13th, 2009 at 2:37 am
I did not buy a better model. It's Canon. . I do not do what you want. . I Like Canon. Period
-
dphamFILMS said on November 13th, 2009 at 3:30 am
You are the completion of the Canon Vixia HF100 HD or not?
-
elitecssplayer said on November 13th, 2009 at 3:43 am
What is SDHC Canon VIXIA HD Camcorder: HF200
-
crockettburnett said on November 13th, 2009 at 4:11 am
Then buy a better model. On the one hand he complains of the lack of image stabilization, on the other complain (wrongly) the "poor" OIS models of better quality. . . The OIS on the S10 and S100 Canon HF sucks compared to the competition, and none of them in competition with the surprising stability of the technology found in Sony SteadyShot XR500 and XR520.
-
rakaryan06 said on November 13th, 2009 at 4:27 am
Sony DCR-SR100 does not have optical image stabilization. . It sucks. .
-
crockettburnett said on November 13th, 2009 at 4:43 am
You talk about your ass. Sony XR500 that I have, the so-called optical stabilization force, which is by no means make worse the video quality, makes only extremely stable. Why spread bullshit info on something you know nothing?
-
rakaryan06 said on November 13th, 2009 at 4:54 am
I think Sony and Canon do not put the optical stabilization in these cams. . Stabilization of the software sucks. . I mean it. . This is not reliable. . IN VIOLATION OF makes the video look pixelate n rough. . This is what I really hate Sony. .
-
crockettburnett said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:00 am
What are you? And what better way to compare the cameras for their opreation and functionality. Sony has much better stability, which is great if something of a movie when you move. F. Help And
-
rakaryan06 said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:36 am
I got the latest Sony HDD Camcorder. . the video quality sucks. . . I mean it. . . . . Canon is the best. I always trusted Canon. But it seems that Canon does not ride as JVC, Sony and Panasonic. .
-
cat325ccr said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:01 am
You can clearly see that the Canon is better than color, sound, light the lamp, etc.
-
Zebio15 said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:58 am
I bet you could change the color settings on both to make them look the same
-
vincnet11 said on November 13th, 2009 at 7:41 am
Without doubt, Canon has earned and is better color and image.
-
joelp44 said on November 13th, 2009 at 8:25 am
Not mean anything. The Canon was much fresher and lighter.
