Digital Camcorder Views Best Buy Digital Camcorder, Mini DV, HD, DVD Camcorder, Digital Vedio Camera, Digital Camcorder Reviews and Price Comparison

25 Responses to “Camcorder Review: Canon Vixia HF100 vs Sony HandyCam HDR-CX12”

  1. dboyd1089 said on

    I think the picture looks better to Sony. . . It seems clearer and more daring. . . the gun seems a bit 'faded. . . gun bot seems to be hit? This is close. . .

  2. iLLipino04 said on

    Sony does not have a guard of wind?

  3. otterboxiphone said on

    The United States is full of obese people.

  4. IpodAppsEverywhere said on

    CANON ROCKS!

  5. ElPandaDeLaAccion said on

    Canon FTW!

  6. newandimproved100 said on

    Sony cancels Canon

  7. xXMercifulFallXx said on

    Quality Vixia quality, in my opinion, is better video and audio.

  8. Sony Sucks A LOT, just have the brand. I have a Sony SR62 and it sucks a lot, even my videos made by a Canon A620 digital camera is better!

  9. I like the Canon better just because the colors appear more natural than the Sony.

  10. DirectThis1 said on

    and what accessories you have on them, if anyone?

  11. DirectThis1 said on

    This parameter is the camera?

  12. Well, I liked the movement of color Canon is also much quieter. I have not. Just checking.

  13. rakaryan06 said on

    I did not buy a better model. It's Canon. . I do not do what you want. . I Like Canon. Period

  14. dphamFILMS said on

    You are the completion of the Canon Vixia HF100 HD or not?

  15. elitecssplayer said on

    What is SDHC Canon VIXIA HD Camcorder: HF200

  16. crockettburnett said on

    Then buy a better model. On the one hand he complains of the lack of image stabilization, on the other complain (wrongly) the "poor" OIS models of better quality. . . The OIS on the S10 and S100 Canon HF sucks compared to the competition, and none of them in competition with the surprising stability of the technology found in Sony SteadyShot XR500 and XR520.

  17. rakaryan06 said on

    Sony DCR-SR100 does not have optical image stabilization. . It sucks. .

  18. crockettburnett said on

    You talk about your ass. Sony XR500 that I have, the so-called optical stabilization force, which is by no means make worse the video quality, makes only extremely stable. Why spread bullshit info on something you know nothing?

  19. rakaryan06 said on

    I think Sony and Canon do not put the optical stabilization in these cams. . Stabilization of the software sucks. . I mean it. . This is not reliable. . IN VIOLATION OF makes the video look pixelate n rough. . This is what I really hate Sony. .

  20. crockettburnett said on

    What are you? And what better way to compare the cameras for their opreation and functionality. Sony has much better stability, which is great if something of a movie when you move. F. Help And

  21. rakaryan06 said on

    I got the latest Sony HDD Camcorder. . the video quality sucks. . . I mean it. . . . . Canon is the best. I always trusted Canon. But it seems that Canon does not ride as JVC, Sony and Panasonic. .

  22. cat325ccr said on

    You can clearly see that the Canon is better than color, sound, light the lamp, etc.

  23. I bet you could change the color settings on both to make them look the same

  24. vincnet11 said on

    Without doubt, Canon has earned and is better color and image.

  25. Not mean anything. The Canon was much fresher and lighter.

Leave a Reply