<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camcorder Review: Canon Vixia HF100 vs Sony HandyCam HDR-CX12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/</link>
	<description>Best Buy Digital Camcorder, Mini DV, HD, DVD Camcorder, Digital Vedio Camera, Digital Camcorder Reviews and Price Comparison</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:47:03 +0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joelp44</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>joelp44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Not mean anything. The Canon was much fresher and lighter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not mean anything. The Canon was much fresher and lighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincnet11</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>vincnet11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Without doubt, Canon has earned and is better color and image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without doubt, Canon has earned and is better color and image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zebio15</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Zebio15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I bet you could change the color settings on both to make them look the same</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you could change the color settings on both to make them look the same</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cat325ccr</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>cat325ccr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>You can clearly see that the Canon is better than color, sound, light the lamp, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can clearly see that the Canon is better than color, sound, light the lamp, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakaryan06</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>rakaryan06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I got the latest Sony HDD Camcorder. . the video quality sucks. . . I mean it. . . . . Canon is the best. I always trusted Canon. But it seems that Canon does not ride as JVC, Sony and Panasonic. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the latest Sony HDD Camcorder. . the video quality sucks. . . I mean it. . . . . Canon is the best. I always trusted Canon. But it seems that Canon does not ride as JVC, Sony and Panasonic. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crockettburnett</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>crockettburnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>What are you? And what better way to compare the cameras for their opreation and functionality. Sony has much better stability, which is great if something of a movie when you move. F. Help And</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you? And what better way to compare the cameras for their opreation and functionality. Sony has much better stability, which is great if something of a movie when you move. F. Help And</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakaryan06</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>rakaryan06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I think Sony and Canon do not put the optical stabilization in these cams. . Stabilization of the software sucks. . I mean it. . This is not reliable. . IN VIOLATION OF makes the video look pixelate n rough. . This is what I really hate Sony. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sony and Canon do not put the optical stabilization in these cams. . Stabilization of the software sucks. . I mean it. . This is not reliable. . IN VIOLATION OF makes the video look pixelate n rough. . This is what I really hate Sony. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crockettburnett</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>crockettburnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>You talk about your ass. Sony XR500 that I have, the so-called optical stabilization force, which is by no means make worse the video quality, makes only extremely stable. Why spread bullshit info on something you know nothing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You talk about your ass. Sony XR500 that I have, the so-called optical stabilization force, which is by no means make worse the video quality, makes only extremely stable. Why spread bullshit info on something you know nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakaryan06</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>rakaryan06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Sony DCR-SR100 does not have optical image stabilization. . It sucks. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony DCR-SR100 does not have optical image stabilization. . It sucks. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crockettburnett</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>crockettburnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamcorderviews.com/camcorder-review-canon-vixia-hf100-vs-sony-handycam-hdr-cx12/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Then buy a better model. On the one hand he complains of the lack of image stabilization, on the other complain (wrongly) the &quot;poor&quot; OIS models of better quality. . . The OIS on the S10 and S100 Canon HF sucks compared to the competition, and none of them in competition with the surprising stability of the technology found in Sony SteadyShot XR500 and XR520.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then buy a better model. On the one hand he complains of the lack of image stabilization, on the other complain (wrongly) the &quot;poor&quot; OIS models of better quality. . . The OIS on the S10 and S100 Canon HF sucks compared to the competition, and none of them in competition with the surprising stability of the technology found in Sony SteadyShot XR500 and XR520.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
